Iwo Jima vs Moskva
| United States amphibious assault ship, 18,474 tons displacement, propelled by a single geared steam turbine. | |
| Origin | 🇺🇸 United States |
| Category | Aircraft carrier |
| Type | Amphibious assault ship |
| Manufacturer | Puget Sound Naval Shipyard |
| Year introduced | 1961 |
| Number built | 7 units |
| Estimated unit price | NA |
| Displacement | 18,474 tons â—‰ |
| Maximum speed | 22.0 knots â—‰ |
| Range | 11,000 nm â—‰ |
| Length | 180.0 m â—‰ |
| Beam | 26.0 m â—‰ |
| Crew | 667 â—‰ |
| Propulsion | 2 × 600 psi (4.1 MPa) boilers, one geared steam turbine, one shaft, 22,000 shaft horsepower (16 MW) |
| Armament |
|
| Displacement | 15,280 tons â—‰ |
| Maximum speed | 28.0 knots â—‰ |
| Range | 9,000 nm at 15 knots â—‰ |
| Length | 189.0 m â—‰ |
| Beam | 34.0 m â—‰ |
| Crew | 850 â—‰ |
| Propulsion | 2 × 45000 hp TV-12 steam turbines, 2 × fixed pitch propellers, 2 × 1500 kW TD-1500 turbine-type generators, 2 × 1500 kW diesel-generators |
| Armament |
|
Performance Radar Chart
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has greater displacement, the Iwo Jima-class or Moskva-class?
The Iwo Jima-class has greater displacement at 18,474 tons compared to the Moskva-class's 15,280 tons.
Which is faster, the Iwo Jima-class or Moskva-class?
The Moskva-class is faster with a maximum speed of 28 knots compared to the Iwo Jima-class's 22 knots.
Which has longer range, the Iwo Jima-class or Moskva-class?
The Iwo Jima-class has a longer range at 11,000 nautical miles compared to the Moskva-class's 9,000 nautical miles.
Which is longer, the Iwo Jima-class or Moskva-class?
The Moskva-class is longer at 189.0 meters compared to the Iwo Jima-class's 180.0 meters.
How many crew members do the Iwo Jima-class and Moskva-class have?
The Moskva-class has a larger crew complement of 850 compared to the Iwo Jima-class's 667 crew members.
Which has been built in greater numbers, the Iwo Jima-class or Moskva-class?
The Iwo Jima-class has been built in greater numbers with 7 vessels compared to 2 vessels of the Moskva-class.