Arleigh Burke vs Ticonderoga
Overview
The Arleigh Burke is a Destroyer, while the Ticonderoga is a Cruiser.
Displacement is 9,900 tons for the Arleigh Burke vs 9,800 tons for the Ticonderoga. The Arleigh Burke reaches 31 knots vs 32 knots for the Ticonderoga. Operational range is 4,400 nautical miles for the Arleigh Burke vs 6,000 for the Ticonderoga. The Arleigh Burke carries a crew of 323 vs 330 for the Ticonderoga.
The Arleigh Burke was produced in 78 units vs 27 for the Ticonderoga. Cost per hull is $2,200M for the Arleigh Burke vs $1,000M for the Ticonderoga. The Arleigh Burke was commissioned in 1991, 8 years after the Ticonderoga (1983).
| American guided-missile destroyer, 9,900 tons displacement, entered service in 1991. | |
| Origin | 🇺🇸 United States |
| Category | Destroyer |
| Type | Guided-missile destroyer |
| Manufacturer | Ingalls Shipbuilding |
| Year introduced | 1991 |
| Number built | 78 units |
| Estimated unit price | $2,200 million |
| American guided-missile cruiser, introduced in 1983, uses four General Electric LM2500 gas turbine engines. | |
| Origin | 🇺🇸 United States |
| Category | Cruiser |
| Type | Guided-missile cruiser |
| Manufacturer | Ingalls Shipbuilding |
| Year introduced | 1983 |
| Number built | 27 units |
| Estimated unit price | $1,000 million |
| Displacement | 9,900 tons ◉ |
| Maximum speed | 31.0 knots ◉ |
| Range | 4,400 nm at 20 knots ◉ |
| Length | 155.3 m ◉ |
| Beam | 20.0 m ◉ |
| Crew | 323 ◉ |
| Propulsion | 4 × General Electric LM2500 gas turbines each generating 26,250 bhp (19,570 kW); coupled to two shafts, each driving a five-bladed reversible controllable-pitch propeller; Total output: 105,000 bhp (78,000 kW) |
| Armament |
|
| Displacement | 9,800 tons ◉ |
| Maximum speed | 32.0 knots ◉ |
| Range | 6,000 nm at 20 knots ◉ |
| Length | 173.0 m ◉ |
| Beam | 16.8 m ◉ |
| Crew | 330 ◉ |
| Propulsion | 4 × General Electric LM2500 gas turbine engines, 2 × controllable-reversible pitch propellers, 2 × rudders |
| Armament |
|
Performance Radar Chart
Detailed Comparison
Loading analysis...
Generating comparison analysis...
Unable to generate comparison at this time.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has greater displacement, the Arleigh Burke-class or Ticonderoga-class?
The Arleigh Burke-class has greater displacement at 9,900 tons compared to the Ticonderoga-class's 9,800 tons.
Which is faster, the Arleigh Burke-class or Ticonderoga-class?
The Ticonderoga-class is faster with a maximum speed of 32 knots compared to the Arleigh Burke-class's 31 knots.
Which has longer range, the Arleigh Burke-class or Ticonderoga-class?
The Ticonderoga-class has a longer range at 6,000 nautical miles compared to the Arleigh Burke-class's 4,400 nautical miles.
Which is longer, the Arleigh Burke-class or Ticonderoga-class?
The Ticonderoga-class is longer at 173.0 meters compared to the Arleigh Burke-class's 155.3 meters.
How many crew members do the Arleigh Burke-class and Ticonderoga-class have?
The Ticonderoga-class has a larger crew complement of 330 compared to the Arleigh Burke-class's 323 crew members.
Which is more expensive, the Arleigh Burke-class or Ticonderoga-class?
The Arleigh Burke-class is more expensive at approximately $2.2 billion per unit compared to the Ticonderoga-class at $1.0 billion.
Which has been built in greater numbers, the Arleigh Burke-class or Ticonderoga-class?
The Arleigh Burke-class has been built in greater numbers with 78 vessels compared to 27 vessels of the Ticonderoga-class.