AGM-130 vs AGM-88 HARM
AGM-130 vs AGM-88 HARM at a glance — range 65 vs 150 km, warhead 908 vs 65 kg, launch weight 1,312 vs 360 kg.
Specifications
|
AGM-130 |
AGM-88 HARM |
| Origin |
🇺🇸 United States |
🇺🇸 United States |
| Category |
Air-to-Surface |
Air-to-Surface |
| Type |
Air-to-surface missile |
Anti-radar missile |
| Manufacturer |
Rockwell |
Raytheon |
| Service year |
1994 |
1985 |
| Number produced |
502 units |
-- units |
| Estimated unit price |
$0.5 million |
$0.9 million |
| Range |
65.0 km |
150.0 km |
| Maximum speed |
NA |
Mach 2.9 |
| Weight |
1,312 kg |
360 kg |
| Warhead |
908.0 kg |
65.0 kg |
| Length |
3.90 m |
4.14 m |
| Diameter |
457 mm |
254 mm |
| Guidance |
GPS/INS, CCD TV, Imaging infrared |
Passive radar homing, GPS/INS, millimeter-wave active radar |
| Warhead type |
High Explosive / Fragmentation |
High Explosive |
Scale Comparison
Detailed Comparison
Loading analysis...
Generating comparison analysis...
Unable to generate comparison at this time.
Change comparison
vs
Which has longer range, the AGM-130 or AGM-88 HARM?
The AGM-88 HARM has a longer range at 150 km compared to the AGM-130's 65 km.
Which has a larger warhead, the AGM-130 or AGM-88 HARM?
The AGM-130 carries a larger warhead at 908 kg compared to the AGM-88 HARM's 65 kg.
Which is heavier, the AGM-130 or AGM-88 HARM?
The AGM-130 is heavier at 1,312 kg compared to the AGM-88 HARM's 360 kg.
Which is longer, the AGM-130 or AGM-88 HARM?
The AGM-88 HARM is longer at 4.14 meters compared to the AGM-130's 3.90 meters.
What guidance systems do the AGM-130 and AGM-88 HARM use?
The AGM-130 uses GPS/INS, CCD TV, Imaging infrared guidance while the AGM-88 HARM uses Passive radar homing, GPS/INS, millimeter-wave active radar guidance.
Which entered service first, the AGM-130 or AGM-88 HARM?
The AGM-88 HARM entered service first in 1985, 9 years before the AGM-130 which entered service in 1994.