GlobalMilitary.net Open-source military intelligence Updated daily

208 Caravan vs 210 Centurion

208 Caravan vs 210 Centurion at a glance — top speed 344 vs 378 km/h, range 1,980 vs 1,667 km, max takeoff weight 3,970 vs 1,814 kg, built 3,000 vs 9,240 units.

Cessna 208 Caravan military transport aircraft side profile drawing
🇺🇸 208 Caravan
Cessna 210 Centurion military transport aircraft side profile drawing
🇺🇸 210 Centurion
Specifications
208 Caravan 210 Centurion
Origin country 🇺🇸 United States 🇺🇸 United States
Category Military Transport Aircraft Military Transport Aircraft
Manufacturer Cessna Cessna
First flight 9 December 1982 1 January 1957
Year introduced 1984 1957
Number produced 3000 units 9240 units
Average unit price $2.1 million --
Wing area 26.0 m² 16.3 m²
Wingspan 15.9 m 11.2 m
Height 4.3 m 3.0 m
Length 12.7 m 8.6 m
Maximum speed 344 km/h 378 km/h
Operational range 1,980 km 1,667 km
Service ceiling 7,600 m 8,230 m
Max. takeoff weight 3,970 kg 1,814 kg
Empty weight 2,073 kg 1,045 kg
Total thrust 1 x 505 kW 1 x 231 kW
Performance Radar Chart

Detailed Comparison

Cessna engineered the 210 Centurion as a high-speed, retractable-gear liaison aircraft, prioritizing transit time and altitude. The 208 Caravan was developed as a fixed-gear heavy-lift utility freighter that eventually adapted to localized strike and ISR missions. Procuring between these platforms requires choosing between a fast, pressurized piston airframe for personnel transport and an unpressurized turboprop capable of deploying precision munitions.

Development and Design

The 210 Centurion, introduced in 1957, iterated toward aerodynamic efficiency over a 29-year production run. Cessna removed the strut-braced wing for a cantilever design in 1967 and integrated a retractable undercarriage—an anomaly for Cessna singles. This drag reduction, combined with turbocharging and cabin pressurization in later models (P210), maximized speed and altitude. The 208 Caravan, initiated in 1981, prioritized austere field operations over aerodynamic cleanliness. Developed with input from Federal Express, its design utilizes a strut-braced wing, a fixed tricycle landing gear, and a single PT6A turboprop engine. The structural simplicity allows for integration of an underbelly cargo pod and, in military iterations, wing hardpoints for external stores.

Specifications and Performances

The aerodynamic divergence dictates their performance metrics. The cantilever 210 Centurion is 34 km/h faster, achieving 378 km/h compared to the 208’s 344 km/h, and its pressurized variants reach an 8,230 m service ceiling. However, the Caravan leverages its 505 kW PT6A turboprop to push its Max Takeoff Weight to 3,970 kg—more than double the Centurion’s 1,814 kg limit. The 210 trades payload for transit speed, while the 208 accepts higher drag in exchange for hauling up to 14 occupants or mounting external weaponry, sustaining a longer 1,980 km range on Jet-A fuel compared to the 210's 1,667 km on avgas.

Deployment and usage

The 210’s military footprint is relegated to secondary roles. Air forces in Latin America and Africa utilize it for border patrol, aerial survey, and liaison flights over sparsely populated terrain, relying on its operating economy. In contrast, the 208 has transitioned into direct combat operations:

  • The AC-208 Combat Caravan entered combat with the Iraqi Air Force in January 2014, firing AGM-114 Hellfire missiles at insurgents.
  • The Egyptian Army deployed 208s in November 2021 for armed counter-smuggling operations along its western border.
  • Afghan Air Force pilots utilized the platform for transport and eventual evacuation to Tajikistan in August 2021.

The US Foreign Military Sales program continues to supply the MC-208 Guardian for ISR and light strike across the Middle East and Africa.

Conclusion

The 208 Caravan holds the definitive edge for modern military procurement. While the 210 Centurion provides faster point-to-point liaison for a six-person crew, its reliance on avgas and piston engines limits its logistical compatibility in contemporary theaters. The 208’s ability to loiter on station with an EO/IR sensor ball, designate targets, and launch Hellfire missiles transforms a civilian freighter into a low-cost close air support asset. For air forces requiring an armed ISR platform for counter-insurgency, the turboprop-powered AC-208 is the mandatory choice over the unarmed, payload-restricted 210.

Change comparison vs

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is faster, the 208 Caravan or 210 Centurion?
The 210 Centurion is faster with a maximum speed of 378 km/h compared to the 208 Caravan's 344 km/h, a difference of 34 km/h.
Which has longer range, the 208 Caravan or 210 Centurion?
The 208 Caravan has a longer range at 1,980 km compared to the 210 Centurion's 1,667 km.
Which can fly higher, the 208 Caravan or 210 Centurion?
The 210 Centurion has a higher service ceiling at 8,230 meters (27,001 ft) compared to the 208 Caravan's 7,600 meters (24,934 ft).
Which is heavier, the 208 Caravan or 210 Centurion?
The 208 Caravan has a higher maximum takeoff weight at 3,970 kg compared to the 210 Centurion's 1,814 kg.
Which is larger, the 208 Caravan or 210 Centurion?
The 208 Caravan is longer at 12.7 meters compared to the 210 Centurion's 8.6 meters.
Which entered service first, the 208 Caravan or 210 Centurion?
The 210 Centurion entered service first in 1957, 27 years before the 208 Caravan which entered service in 1984.
Which has been built in greater numbers, the 208 Caravan or 210 Centurion?
The 210 Centurion has been produced in greater numbers with 9,240 units compared to 3,000 units of the 208 Caravan.