3M22 Zircon vs AGM-158C LRASM
3M22 Zircon vs AGM-158C LRASM at a glance — range 1,000 vs 370 km, speed 11,113 vs 1,050 km/h, warhead 300 vs 453 kg.
Specifications
|
3M22 Zircon |
AGM-158C LRASM |
| Origin |
🇷🇺 Russia |
🇺🇸 United States |
| Category |
Anti-Ship |
Anti-Ship |
| Type |
Hypersonic anti-ship cruise missile |
Anti-ship cruise missile |
| Manufacturer |
NPO Mashinostroyeniya |
Lockheed Martin |
| Service year |
2023 |
2018 |
| Number produced |
-- units |
-- units |
| Estimated unit price |
$10 million |
$3.2 million |
| Range |
1,000.0 km |
370.0 km |
| Maximum speed |
Mach 9.1 |
Mach 0.9 |
| Weight |
-- kg |
1,250 kg |
| Warhead |
300.0 kg |
453.0 kg |
| Length |
9.00 m |
4.26 m |
| Diameter |
600 mm |
635 mm |
| Guidance |
-- |
GPS, INS, IIR, AI |
| Warhead type |
High Explosive or Nuclear |
HE blast fragmentation penetrator |
Scale Comparison
Detailed Comparison
Loading analysis...
Generating comparison analysis...
Unable to generate comparison at this time.
Change comparison
vs
Which has longer range, the 3M22 Zircon or AGM-158C LRASM?
The 3M22 Zircon has a longer range at 1,000 km compared to the AGM-158C LRASM's 370 km.
Which is faster, the 3M22 Zircon or AGM-158C LRASM?
The 3M22 Zircon is faster with a maximum speed of Mach 9.1 compared to the AGM-158C LRASM's Mach 0.9.
Which has a larger warhead, the 3M22 Zircon or AGM-158C LRASM?
The AGM-158C LRASM carries a larger warhead at 453 kg compared to the 3M22 Zircon's 300 kg.
Which is heavier, the 3M22 Zircon or AGM-158C LRASM?
The AGM-158C LRASM is heavier at 1,250 kg compared to the 3M22 Zircon's 0 kg.
Which is longer, the 3M22 Zircon or AGM-158C LRASM?
The 3M22 Zircon is longer at 9.00 meters compared to the AGM-158C LRASM's 4.26 meters.
Which entered service first, the 3M22 Zircon or AGM-158C LRASM?
The AGM-158C LRASM entered service first in 2018, 5 years before the 3M22 Zircon which entered service in 2023.