ASM-3 vs AGM-158C LRASM
ASM-3 vs AGM-158C LRASM at a glance — range 1,000 vs 370 km, speed 3,704 vs 1,050 km/h, warhead 150 vs 453 kg, launch weight 940 vs 1,250 kg.
Specifications
|
ASM-3 |
AGM-158C LRASM |
| Origin |
🇯🇵 Japan |
🇺🇸 United States |
| Category |
Anti-Ship |
Anti-Ship |
| Type |
Air-to-surface anti-ship missile |
Anti-ship cruise missile |
| Manufacturer |
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries |
Lockheed Martin |
| Service year |
2021 |
2018 |
| Number produced |
-- units |
-- units |
| Estimated unit price |
NA |
$3.2 million |
| Range |
1,000.0 km |
370.0 km |
| Maximum speed |
Mach 3.0 |
Mach 0.9 |
| Weight |
940 kg |
1,250 kg |
| Warhead |
150.0 kg |
453.0 kg |
| Length |
6.00 m |
4.26 m |
| Diameter |
-- mm |
635 mm |
| Guidance |
Inertial/GPS, mid-course correction, radar homing |
GPS, INS, IIR, AI |
| Warhead type |
-- |
HE blast fragmentation penetrator |
Detailed Comparison
Loading analysis...
Generating comparison analysis...
Unable to generate comparison at this time.
Change comparison
vs
Which has longer range, the ASM-3 or AGM-158C LRASM?
The ASM-3 has a longer range at 1,000 km compared to the AGM-158C LRASM's 370 km.
Which is faster, the ASM-3 or AGM-158C LRASM?
The ASM-3 is faster with a maximum speed of Mach 3.0 compared to the AGM-158C LRASM's Mach 0.9.
Which has a larger warhead, the ASM-3 or AGM-158C LRASM?
The AGM-158C LRASM carries a larger warhead at 453 kg compared to the ASM-3's 150 kg.
Which is heavier, the ASM-3 or AGM-158C LRASM?
The AGM-158C LRASM is heavier at 1,250 kg compared to the ASM-3's 940 kg.
Which is longer, the ASM-3 or AGM-158C LRASM?
The ASM-3 is longer at 6.00 meters compared to the AGM-158C LRASM's 4.26 meters.
What guidance systems do the ASM-3 and AGM-158C LRASM use?
The ASM-3 uses Inertial/GPS, mid-course correction, radar homing guidance while the AGM-158C LRASM uses GPS, INS, IIR, AI guidance.
Which entered service first, the ASM-3 or AGM-158C LRASM?
The AGM-158C LRASM entered service first in 2018, 3 years before the ASM-3 which entered service in 2021.