Akizuki vs Daring
Akizuki vs Daring at a glance — displacement 5,000 vs 7,350 tons, length 150 vs 152 m, speed 30 vs 32 knots, crew 200 vs 191.
Specifications
|
Akizuki |
Daring |
| Origin |
🇯🇵 Japan |
🇬🇧 United Kingdom |
| Category |
Destroyer |
Destroyer |
| Type |
Destroyer |
Guided-missile destroyer |
| Manufacturer |
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries |
BAE Systems Maritime – Naval Ships |
| Year introduced |
2012 |
2009 |
| Number built |
4 units |
6 units |
| Estimated unit price |
$893 million |
$1,300 million |
| Displacement |
5,000 tons |
7,350 tons |
| Maximum speed |
30.0 knots |
32.0 knots |
| Range |
NA |
7,000 nm at 18 knots |
| Length |
150.5 m |
152.4 m |
| Beam |
18.3 m |
21.2 m |
| Crew |
200 |
191 |
Armament & Systems
|
Akizuki |
Daring |
| Armament |
- 1 × Mk 45 Mod 4 127 mm (5 in)/54 gun
- 8 × Type 90 Anti-ship missile
- 2 × 20 mm Phalanx Block1B CIWS
- 2 × HOS-303 triple 324 mm (12.8 in) torpedo tubes
- Anti-Torpedo system
- 32-cell Mk 41 Vertical Launching System
- RIM-162 ESSM SAM
- RUM-139 VL-ASROC (DD 115)
- Type 07 VL-ASROC (DD 116 to DD 118)
|
- 48 × Sylver vertical launching system A50 (Aster 15 and Aster 30 missiles)
- 24 × Sea Ceptor silos (planned)
- 1 × 4.5 inch Mark 8 naval gun
- 2 × DS30B Mk 1 30 mm guns
- 2 × 20 mm Phalanx CIWS
- 2 × 7.62 mm Miniguns (replaced by Browning .50 caliber heavy machine guns)
- 6 × 7.62 mm general purpose machine guns
- 2 x DragonFire laser-based directed energy weapon (planned)
- Harpoon Block 1C SSMs (retired 2023)
- Naval Strike Missile (replacement)
|
| Propulsion |
COGAG, two shafts, four Rolls-Royce Spey SM1C turbines |
2 shafts integrated electric propulsion with 2 × Rolls-Royce WR-21 gas turbines (21.5 MW each) and 2 × Wärtsilä 12V200 diesel generators (2 MW each) or 3 × MTU 4000 series diesel generators (3 MW each) |
Detailed Comparison
Loading analysis...
Generating comparison analysis...
Unable to generate comparison at this time.
Change comparison
vs
Which has greater displacement, the Akizuki-class or Daring-class?
The Daring-class has greater displacement at 7,350 tons compared to the Akizuki-class's 5,000 tons.
Which is faster, the Akizuki-class or Daring-class?
The Daring-class is faster with a maximum speed of 32 knots compared to the Akizuki-class's 30 knots.
Which has longer range, the Akizuki-class or Daring-class?
The Daring-class has a longer range at 7,000 nautical miles compared to the Akizuki-class's 0 nautical miles.
Which is longer, the Akizuki-class or Daring-class?
The Daring-class is longer at 152.4 meters compared to the Akizuki-class's 150.5 meters.
How many crew members do the Akizuki-class and Daring-class have?
The Akizuki-class has a larger crew complement of 200 compared to the Daring-class's 191 crew members.
Which is more expensive, the Akizuki-class or Daring-class?
The Daring-class is more expensive at approximately $1.3 billion per unit compared to the Akizuki-class at $893 million.
Which has been built in greater numbers, the Akizuki-class or Daring-class?
The Daring-class has been built in greater numbers with 6 vessels compared to 4 vessels of the Akizuki-class.