Skipjack vs Type 209
Overview
The Skipjack and the Type 209 are both Submarine classes.
The Skipjack displaces 3,124 tons β 2.4x the Type 209's 1,285 tons. The Skipjack reaches 15 knots vs 11 knots for the Type 209. Operational range is 99,999 nautical miles for the Skipjack vs 11,000 for the Type 209. The Skipjack carries a crew of 93 vs 36 for the Type 209. Submerged displacement is 3,569 tons for the Skipjack vs 1,810 tons for the Type 209. The Type 209 can dive to 500 m compared to 210 m for the Skipjack.
The Skipjack was produced in 6 units vs 68 for the Type 209. Cost per hull is $40M for the Skipjack vs $285M for the Type 209. The Skipjack was commissioned in 1959, 12 years before the Type 209 (1971).
| American nuclear-powered fast attack submarine, introduced in 1959, displaced 3,124 tons. | |
| Origin | πΊπΈ United States |
| Category | Submarine |
| Type | Nuclear-powered fast attack submarine |
| Manufacturer | General Dynamics Electric Boat |
| Year introduced | 1959 |
| Number built | 6 units |
| Estimated unit price | $40 million |
| Displacement | 3,124 tons β |
| Maximum speed | 15.0 knots β |
| Range | Unlimited β |
| Length | 76.7 m β |
| Beam | 9.6 m β |
| Crew | 93 β |
| Max depth | 210 m β |
| Propulsion | 1 S5W reactor, geared steam turbines (15,000 shp (11,000 kW)), 1 shaft |
| Armament |
|
| Displacement | 1,285 tons β |
| Maximum speed | 11.0 knots β |
| Range | 11,000 nm at 10 knots β |
| Length | 64.4 m β |
| Beam | 6.5 m β |
| Crew | 36 β |
| Max depth | 500 m β |
| Propulsion | Diesel-electric, 4 diesels, 1 shaft, 6,100 shp (4,500 kW) |
| Armament |
|
Performance Radar Chart
Detailed Comparison
Generating comparison analysis...
Unable to generate comparison at this time.