Namer vs Puma IFV
Overview
The Namer and the Puma IFV are both Armored Personnel Carriers, manufactured by IDF Ordnance and PSM respectively.
The Namer weighs 60.0 tons vs 43.0 tons for the Puma IFV. Top speed is 85 km/h for the Namer vs 70 km/h for the Puma IFV. Operational range is 500 km for the Namer vs 600 km for the Puma IFV. The Namer is armed with a Samson RCWS equipped with either 12.7 mm (0.50 in) M2 machine gun or Mk 19 grenade launcher, while the Puma IFV carries a 30 mm MK 30-2/ABM autocannon.
The Namer has been produced in 290 units vs 350 for the Puma IFV. Unit cost is $5M for the Namer vs $21M for the Puma IFV. The Namer entered service 7 years before the Puma IFV (2008 vs 2015).
| Israeli APC, entered service in 2008, based on the Merkava tank chassis. | |
|
|
| Origin country | 🇮🇱 Israel |
| Category | Armored Personnel Carrier |
| Type | Heavy armoured personnel carrier |
| Manufacturer | IDF Ordnance |
| Number produced | 290 units |
| Estimated unit price | $5 million |
| German IFV, entering service in 2015, has a modular design for varied mission requirements. | |
|
|
| Origin country | 🇩🇪 Germany |
| Category | Armored Personnel Carrier |
| Type | Infantry fighting vehicle |
| Manufacturer | PSM |
| Number produced | 350 units |
| Estimated unit price | $21 million |
| Combat weight | 60.0 tons ◉ |
| Maximum speed | 85 km/h ◉ |
| Operational range | 500 km ◉ |
| Length | -- m |
| Width | -- m |
| Height | -- m |
| Crew | 3 (commander, driver, RCWS operator) + 9 troops |
| Engine | 1,200 hp (895 kW) turbocharged diesel engine |
| Main armament | Samson RCWS equipped with either 12.7 mm (0.50 in) M2 machine gun or Mk 19 grenade launcher |
| Secondary weapon | 1 × 7.62 mm (0.300 in) FN MAG MG |
| Combat weight | 43.0 tons ◉ |
| Maximum speed | 70 km/h ◉ |
| Operational range | 600 km ◉ |
| Length | 7.40 m |
| Width | 4.00 m |
| Height | 3.60 m |
| Crew | 3 |
| Engine | MTU Fried. MT 892 Ka-501 v10 11.1-litre 1,088 PS (800 kW) |
| Main armament | 30 mm MK 30-2/ABM autocannon |
| Secondary weapon | HK MG5 (7.62×51mm NATO) |
Performance Radar Chart
Detailed Comparison
Generating comparison analysis...
Unable to generate comparison at this time.