AS 202 Bravo vs CT/4 Airtrainer
Overview
The AS 202 Bravo and the CT/4 Airtrainer are both Military Training Aircraft, manufactured by FFA and Pacific Aerospace respectively.
Top speed is 211 km/h for the AS 202 Bravo vs 387 km/h for the CT/4 Airtrainer. The AS 202 Bravo has an operational range of 890 km vs 963 km for the CT/4 Airtrainer. The CT/4 Airtrainer operates at altitudes up to 5,550 m compared to 4,265 m for the AS 202 Bravo.
The AS 202 Bravo has been produced in 214 units vs 155 for the CT/4 Airtrainer. The AS 202 Bravo first flew 3 years before the CT/4 Airtrainer (1969 vs 1972).
| Swiss-Italian light trainer and utility aircraft, developed in the late 1960s, used primarily for military and civil pilot training. | |
|
|
| Origin country | 🇨🇠Switzerland |
| Category | Military Training Aircraft |
| Manufacturer | FFA |
| First flight | 9 March 1969 |
| Year introduced | 1971 |
| Number produced | 214 units |
| Average unit price | -- |
| New Zealand-designed basic training aircraft, developed in the early 1970s and operated by several air forces for pilot instruction. | |
|
|
| Origin country | 🇳🇿 New Zealand |
| Category | Military Training Aircraft |
| Manufacturer | Pacific Aerospace |
| First flight | 23 February 1972 |
| Year introduced | 1973 |
| Number produced | 155 units |
| Average unit price | -- |
| Wing area | 13.9 m² ◉ |
| Wingspan | 9.8 m â—‰ |
| Height | 2.8 m â—‰ |
| Length | 7.5 m â—‰ |
| Maximum speed | 211 km/h â—‰ |
| Operational range | 890 km â—‰ |
| Service ceiling | 4,265 m â—‰ |
| Max. takeoff weight | 999 kg â—‰ |
| Empty weight | 630 kg â—‰ |
| Total thrust | 1 x 112 kW â—‰ |
| Wing area | 12.0 m² ◉ |
| Wingspan | 7.9 m â—‰ |
| Height | 2.6 m â—‰ |
| Length | 7.2 m â—‰ |
| Maximum speed | 387 km/h â—‰ |
| Operational range | 963 km â—‰ |
| Service ceiling | 5,550 m â—‰ |
| Max. takeoff weight | 1,180 kg â—‰ |
| Empty weight | 770 kg â—‰ |
| Total thrust | 1 x 224 kW â—‰ |
Performance Radar Chart
Detailed Comparison
Loading analysis...
Generating comparison analysis...
Unable to generate comparison at this time.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is faster, the AS 202 Bravo or CT/4 Airtrainer?
The CT/4 Airtrainer is faster with a maximum speed of 387 km/h compared to the AS 202 Bravo's 211 km/h, a difference of 176 km/h.
Which has longer range, the AS 202 Bravo or CT/4 Airtrainer?
The CT/4 Airtrainer has a longer range at 963 km compared to the AS 202 Bravo's 890 km.
Which can fly higher, the AS 202 Bravo or CT/4 Airtrainer?
The CT/4 Airtrainer has a higher service ceiling at 5,550 meters (18,208 ft) compared to the AS 202 Bravo's 4,265 meters (13,992 ft).
Which is heavier, the AS 202 Bravo or CT/4 Airtrainer?
The CT/4 Airtrainer has a higher maximum takeoff weight at 1,180 kg compared to the AS 202 Bravo's 999 kg.
Which is larger, the AS 202 Bravo or CT/4 Airtrainer?
The AS 202 Bravo is longer at 7.5 meters compared to the CT/4 Airtrainer's 7.2 meters.
Which entered service first, the AS 202 Bravo or CT/4 Airtrainer?
The AS 202 Bravo entered service first in 1971, 2 years before the CT/4 Airtrainer which entered service in 1973.
Which has been built in greater numbers, the AS 202 Bravo or CT/4 Airtrainer?
The AS 202 Bravo has been produced in greater numbers with 214 units compared to 155 units of the CT/4 Airtrainer.