DA42 Twin Star vs L-39 Albatros
Overview
The DA42 Twin Star and the L-39 Albatros are both Military Training Aircraft, manufactured by Diamond and Aero respectively.
The L-39 Albatros reaches 750 km/h — 2.1x the DA42 Twin Star's 354 km/h. The DA42 Twin Star has an operational range of 2,250 km vs 1,100 km for the L-39 Albatros. The L-39 Albatros operates at altitudes up to 11,500 m compared to 9,000 m for the DA42 Twin Star. At 4,700 kg MTOW, the L-39 Albatros is 2.4x the DA42 Twin Star's 2,000 kg.
The DA42 Twin Star has been produced in 600 units vs 2,900 for the L-39 Albatros. Unit cost is $1.3M for the DA42 Twin Star vs $1M for the L-39 Albatros. The L-39 Albatros first flew 34 years before the DA42 Twin Star (1968 vs 2002).
| Austrian twin-engine propeller-driven airplane, notable for its utility in civil aviation and pilot training post-2004. | |
|
|
| Origin country | 🇦🇹 Austria |
| Category | Military Training Aircraft |
| Manufacturer | Diamond |
| First flight | 9 December 2002 |
| Year introduced | 2004 |
| Number produced | 600 units |
| Average unit price | $1.3 million |
| Czech training jet, operational since the Cold War, deployed worldwide for various military aviation roles. | |
|
|
| Origin country | 🇨🇿 Czechia |
| Category | Military Training Aircraft |
| Manufacturer | Aero |
| First flight | 4 November 1968 |
| Year introduced | 1972 |
| Number produced | 2900 units |
| Average unit price | $1 million |
| Wing area | 16.3 m² ◉ |
| Wingspan | 13.4 m â—‰ |
| Height | 2.5 m â—‰ |
| Length | 8.0 m â—‰ |
| Maximum speed | 354 km/h â—‰ |
| Operational range | 2,250 km â—‰ |
| Service ceiling | 9,000 m â—‰ |
| Max. takeoff weight | 2,000 kg â—‰ |
| Empty weight | 1,200 kg â—‰ |
| Total thrust | 2 x 50 kW â—‰ |
| Wing area | 18.8 m² ◉ |
| Wingspan | 9.5 m â—‰ |
| Height | 4.8 m â—‰ |
| Length | 12.1 m â—‰ |
| Maximum speed | 750 km/h â—‰ |
| Operational range | 1,100 km â—‰ |
| Service ceiling | 11,500 m â—‰ |
| Max. takeoff weight | 4,700 kg â—‰ |
| Empty weight | 3,459 kg â—‰ |
| Total thrust | 1 x 1,720 kgf â—‰ |
Performance Radar Chart
Detailed Comparison
Generating comparison analysis...
Unable to generate comparison at this time.