GlobalMilitary.net Open-source military intelligence Updated daily

H125M / AS550 Fennec vs SA340 Gazelle

H125M / AS550 Fennec vs SA340 Gazelle at a glance — top speed 260 vs 310 km/h, range 720 vs 361 km, max takeoff weight 2,250 vs 2,100 kg, built 531 vs 1,775 units.

Specifications
H125M / AS550 Fennec SA340 Gazelle
Origin country 🇫🇷 France 🇫🇷 France
Category Military Helicopters Military Helicopters
Manufacturer Aérospatiale Aérospatiale
First flight 27 June 1974 7 April 1967
Year introduced 1990 1971
Number produced 531 units 1775 units
Average unit price $5 million $1.7 million
Wingspan 12.9 m 10.5 m
Height 3.1 m 3.2 m
Length 10.9 m 11.9 m
Maximum speed 260 km/h 310 km/h
Operational range 720 km 361 km
Service ceiling 4,600 m 4,450 m
Max. takeoff weight 2,250 kg 2,100 kg
Empty weight 1,174 kg 1,009 kg
Total thrust 1 x 632 kW 1 x 650 kW
Performance Radar Chart

Detailed Comparison

The Aérospatiale SA340 Gazelle represents a bespoke military design optimized for speed and agility in European anti-tank theaters, whereas the Airbus H125M Fennec derives its utility from the commercial AS350 Ecureuil airframe. While the Gazelle prioritized aerodynamic efficiency for the high-intensity threat environment of the 1970s, the Fennec reflects the post-Cold War shift toward cost-effective, modular platforms capable of light transport and asymmetric warfare support.

Development and Design

Development of the Gazelle focused on survivability and speed, introducing the fenestron shrouded tail rotor to reduce noise and ground hazards—critical for nap-of-the-earth operations. Its rigid rotor system allows for high maneuverability, essential for pop-up anti-tank attacks using wire-guided munitions. Conversely, the Fennec retains the commercial Ecureuil’s Starflex main rotor and spacious cabin. This design choice sacrifices the Gazelle’s aerodynamic sleekness for maintenance simplicity and payload versatility, allowing the Fennec to transition between naval utility, troop insertion, and light attack roles without the structural constraints of a dedicated attack airframe.

Specifications and Performance

The performance gap defines their doctrinal roles. The Gazelle offers superior kinematics, achieving a maximum speed of 310 km/h compared to the Fennec’s 260 km/h, a 50 km/h advantage derived from its streamlined fuselage. However, the Fennec dominates in endurance and logistics. Its 720 km range effectively doubles the Gazelle’s 361 km operational radius, a critical factor for the maritime and patrol profiles favored by operators like the Royal Malaysian Navy. While the Gazelle’s 650 kW Astazou XIVH turbine offers a slightly higher power output than the Fennec’s 632 kW Arriel 2B, the Fennec utilizes its power for lift capability, managing a higher maximum takeoff weight (2250 kg versus 2100 kg) and a significantly more usable internal volume for personnel or cargo.

Deployment and Usage

Operational history bifurcates between high-intensity conflict and constabulary duties. The Gazelle saw heavy combat in the Falklands, the 1982 Lebanon War, and Operation Desert Storm, where French ALAT units utilized HOT missiles for anti-armor interdiction. Its combat record validates it as a kinetic platform, though losses in the Falklands and Yugoslavia highlighted vulnerability to small arms fire. The Fennec’s service record centers on lower-intensity environments. Danish units deployed Fennecs to Afghanistan for observation, while the Royal Malaysian Navy utilized the platform for counter-piracy operations in the Gulf of Aden, leveraging its range and cabin space for sniper teams. The Fennec serves primarily as a force multiplier for surveillance and light fire support rather than a frontline hunter-killer.

Conclusion

The SA340 Gazelle remains the superior platform for dedicated scouting and anti-armor missions where speed and agility determine survival. However, its inability to carry significant internal cargo limits its utility outside direct combat support. The H125M Fennec stands as the more practical acquisition for modern, budget-constrained forces requiring a multi-mission airframe. It trades the Gazelle's kinetic pedigree for logistical efficiency, range, and cabin volume, making it the preferable choice for maritime security and counter-insurgency operations where loiter time outweighs raw speed.

Change comparison vs

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is faster, the H125M / AS550 Fennec or SA340 Gazelle?
The SA340 Gazelle is faster with a maximum speed of 310 km/h compared to the H125M / AS550 Fennec's 260 km/h, a difference of 50 km/h.
Which has longer range, the H125M / AS550 Fennec or SA340 Gazelle?
The H125M / AS550 Fennec has a longer range at 720 km compared to the SA340 Gazelle's 361 km.
Which can fly higher, the H125M / AS550 Fennec or SA340 Gazelle?
The H125M / AS550 Fennec has a higher service ceiling at 4,600 meters (15,091 ft) compared to the SA340 Gazelle's 4,450 meters (14,599 ft).
Which is heavier, the H125M / AS550 Fennec or SA340 Gazelle?
The H125M / AS550 Fennec has a higher maximum takeoff weight at 2,250 kg compared to the SA340 Gazelle's 2,100 kg.
Which is larger, the H125M / AS550 Fennec or SA340 Gazelle?
The SA340 Gazelle is longer at 11.9 meters compared to the H125M / AS550 Fennec's 10.9 meters.
Which is more expensive, the H125M / AS550 Fennec or SA340 Gazelle?
The H125M / AS550 Fennec is more expensive at approximately $5.0 million per unit compared to the SA340 Gazelle at $1.7 million.
Which entered service first, the H125M / AS550 Fennec or SA340 Gazelle?
The SA340 Gazelle entered service first in 1971, 19 years before the H125M / AS550 Fennec which entered service in 1990.
Which has been built in greater numbers, the H125M / AS550 Fennec or SA340 Gazelle?
The SA340 Gazelle has been produced in greater numbers with 1,775 units compared to 531 units of the H125M / AS550 Fennec.