GlobalMilitary.net Open-source military intelligence Updated daily

AGM-114 Hellfire vs Brimstone

AGM-114 Hellfire vs Brimstone at a glance β€” range 11 vs 20 km, speed 1,601 vs 1,620 km/h, warhead 8 vs 6 kg, launch weight 49 vs 49 kg.

Specifications
AGM-114 Hellfire Brimstone
Origin πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FranceπŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ United Kingdom
Category Anti-Tank Anti-Tank
Type Anti-tank guided missile Anti-tank missile
Manufacturer Hughes MBDA
Service year 1984 2005
Number produced -- units 2,000 units
Estimated unit price $0.2 million $0.2 million
Range 11.0 km 20.0 km
Maximum speed Mach 1.3 Mach 1.3
Weight 49 kg 49 kg
Warhead 8.0 kg 6.0 kg
Length 1.80 m 1.80 m
Diameter 180 mm 178 mm
Guidance Semi-active laser homing Millimetric-wave active radar homing, INS, laser guidance
Warhead type Multi-function warhead High Explosive Anti Tank
Scale Comparison
AGM-114 HELLFIRE 1.80 m BRIMSTONE 1.80 m 1.75 m
Performance Radar Chart

Detailed Comparison

The MBDA Brimstone and Lockheed Martin AGM-114 Hellfire occupy the 50-kilogram class of precision air-to-ground missiles. The Hellfire controls the rotary and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) markets as a semi-active laser (SAL) weapon, while Brimstone was optimized for fast-jet deployment using active radar homing for autonomous, multi-target engagements.

Development and Design

Hellfire originated in 1974 to arm US Army attack helicopters against Soviet armor. Its design iterated through specific warhead variants, eventually consolidating into the multi-purpose AGM-114R in 2012. MBDA’s Brimstone emerged from a 1980s Royal Air Force requirement to replace BL.755 cluster bombs. Both missiles weigh 49 kg and share similar dimensions, but Brimstone was structurally engineered from its inception to withstand the thermodynamic and aerodynamic stress of supersonic carriage on fast jets like the Tornado GR4 and Eurofighter Typhoon.

Performance and Capabilities

Both missiles achieve Mach 1.3, but Brimstone holds a kinetic advantage with a 20 km range versus Hellfire’s 11 km. Hellfire requires specialized rail adapters for fixed-wing carriage and remains optimized for low-and-slow platforms (AH-64, MQ-9). Hellfire offsets its range deficit with warhead modularity, ranging from the 8.0 kg tandem anti-armor to the R-9X kinetic blade variant designed for zero-explosive targeted strikes. Brimstone utilizes a 6.0 kg tandem shaped-charge, which evolved into a multi-effect warhead in the Brimstone 3 iteration to defeat reactive armor and soft targets.

Guidance and Technology

Hellfire relies predominantly on SAL homing, requiring continuous target illumination. The AGM-114L Longbow variant integrated millimeter-wave (mmW) radar for fire-and-forget targeting. Brimstone reversed this developmental trajectory. It debuted with a 94-GHz mmW seeker for autonomous target sorting, allowing a single aircraft to launch a salvo that independently identifies and strikes multiple targets in a staggered sequence. MBDA later added a SAL channel (Dual-Mode Brimstone) to permit man-in-the-loop targeting in cluttered environments where rules of engagement prohibit autonomous firing.

Deployment and Combat Record

Hellfire is the most proliferated missile in its class. It executed the majority of US and allied targeted strikes in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria from UAV platforms. Brimstone saw combat in Iraq (Operation Telic), Libya, and against ISIL, specifically tasked when fixed-wing aircraft needed to engage moving targets like fast inshore attack craft or technicals. In the Russo-Ukrainian War, both systems operate in high-threat electromagnetic and air defense environments. Ground-launched Brimstone, fired from improvised Wolfram vehicles, successfully engaged Russian armor and an S-400 battery in Crimea in 2023. Hellfire has struggled to institutionalize surface-to-surface utility, with US Army M-SHORAD Stryker integration canceled due to safety constraints.

Conclusion

Hellfire wins on platform integration, unit cost, and warhead variety. It is the requisite solution for permissive airspace where UAVs and helicopters can loiter and designate targets. Brimstone holds the tactical edge in high-intensity, contested environments. Its 20 km range, autonomous mmW seeker, and salvo target-sorting algorithms allow strike packages to engage dispersed mechanized formations without loitering. For close air support and targeted strikes from persistent platforms, Hellfire is the baseline; for standoff strikes against moving armor arrays by fixed-wing aircraft, Brimstone is the superior weapon.

Change comparison vs

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has longer range, the AGM-114 Hellfire or Brimstone?
The Brimstone has a longer range at 20 km compared to the AGM-114 Hellfire's 11 km.
Which is faster, the AGM-114 Hellfire or Brimstone?
The Brimstone is faster with a maximum speed of Mach 1.3 compared to the AGM-114 Hellfire's Mach 1.3.
Which has a larger warhead, the AGM-114 Hellfire or Brimstone?
The AGM-114 Hellfire carries a larger warhead at 8 kg compared to the Brimstone's 6 kg.
Which is heavier, the AGM-114 Hellfire or Brimstone?
Both the AGM-114 Hellfire and Brimstone have the same weight of 49 kg.
Which is longer, the AGM-114 Hellfire or Brimstone?
Both the AGM-114 Hellfire and Brimstone have the same length of 1.80 meters.
What guidance systems do the AGM-114 Hellfire and Brimstone use?
The AGM-114 Hellfire uses Semi-active laser homing guidance while the Brimstone uses Millimetric-wave active radar homing, INS, laser guidance guidance.
Which entered service first, the AGM-114 Hellfire or Brimstone?
The AGM-114 Hellfire entered service first in 1984, 21 years before the Brimstone which entered service in 2005.