GlobalMilitary.net Open-source military intelligence Updated daily

A400M Atlas vs C-17 Globemaster III

A400M Atlas vs C-17 Globemaster III at a glance — top speed 780 vs 930 km/h, range 3,300 vs 4,480 km, max takeoff weight 141,000 vs 259,460 kg, built 174 vs 279 units.

Airbus A400M Atlas military transport aircraft side profile drawing
🇪🇺 A400M Atlas
Specifications
A400M Atlas C-17 Globemaster III
Origin country 🇪🇺 Europe 🇺🇸 United States
Category Military Transport Aircraft Military Transport Aircraft
Manufacturer Airbus McDonnell Douglas
First flight 11 December 2009 15 September 1991
Year introduced 2013 1993
Number produced 174 units 279 units
Average unit price $152 million $340 million
Wing area 221.5 m² 353.0 m²
Wingspan 42.4 m 51.8 m
Height 14.7 m 16.8 m
Length 45.1 m 53.0 m
Maximum speed 780 km/h 930 km/h
Operational range 3,300 km 4,480 km
Service ceiling 12,500 m 13,715 m
Max. takeoff weight 141,000 kg 259,460 kg
Empty weight 66,500 kg 122,000 kg
Total thrust 4 x 8,203 kW 4 x 18,909 kgf
Performance Radar Chart

Detailed Comparison

The Airbus A400M Atlas is a modern turboprop designed to replace tactical transports like the C-130 and C-160 while offering strategic range, whereas the McDonnell Douglas C-17 Globemaster III is a larger, jet-powered strategic airlifter designed to haul outsize cargo over intercontinental distances with the ability to use austere airfields.

Development and Design

The A400M emerged from a complex, multi-national European program, inheriting modern Airbus technology. Key features include a fly-by-wire flight control system derived from the A380, extensive use of composites for over 30% of its structure, and advanced, counter-rotating Europrop TP400 turboprops designed to enhance lift and short-field performance. In contrast, the C-17 was a US Air Force-driven project to create a successor to the C-141 Starlifter. Its design prioritizes robustness and strategic haulage, built around four powerful Pratt & Whitney F117 turbofan engines. It features a conventional high-wing, T-tail configuration and a specialized landing gear system that enables routine operations on short and unprepared runways.

Specifications and Performances

The C-17’s larger airframe and turbofan engines allow it to carry a significantly heavier maximum payload (approximately 77 tonnes) compared to the A400M's 37-tonne capacity. Its Max Takeoff Weight of 259,460 kg is nearly double the A400M's 141,000 kg, and it achieves a higher maximum speed (930 km/h vs. 780 km/h). However, the A400M is optimized for tactical access. Its turboprop configuration and aerodynamic design allow for a significantly shorter takeoff distance (1,150 m vs. the C-17's 2,500 m), granting it access to more restricted airfields where a C-17 cannot operate. While the C-17’s cargo hold is larger and can accommodate main battle tanks, the A400M’s bay is sized to carry heavy equipment like armored vehicles or helicopters that legacy tactical transports could not.

Deployment and usage

As a mature platform in service since 1993, the C-17 has been the strategic airlift backbone for the U.S. and its allies. It has an extensive operational history in major combat operations, including Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom, and has been a primary asset in large-scale humanitarian missions globally. The A400M, entering service two decades later in 2013, has steadily built its operational record. It has been deployed by European air forces in missions to Mali and Afghanistan, conducted disaster relief in the Caribbean, and participated in the 2021 Kabul evacuations. Its capabilities continue to evolve, with recent certifications for complex tasks like mixed airdrops of personnel and cargo.

Conclusion

The A400M and C-17 fill distinct operational roles. The C-17 is an unambiguous strategic airlifter, peerless in its ability to rapidly move heavy and outsize cargo across intercontinental distances. The A400M is fundamentally a tactical airlifter with strategic reach, designed to bridge the capability gap between smaller transports like the C-130 and strategic jets like the C-17. It trades the C-17’s ultimate payload capacity for superior performance from short and semi-prepared runways, making it a versatile platform for forces needing a single aircraft to fulfill both tactical delivery and long-range transport missions.

Change comparison vs

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is faster, the A400M Atlas or C-17 Globemaster III?
The C-17 Globemaster III is faster with a maximum speed of 930 km/h compared to the A400M Atlas's 780 km/h, a difference of 150 km/h.
Which has longer range, the A400M Atlas or C-17 Globemaster III?
The C-17 Globemaster III has a longer range at 4,480 km compared to the A400M Atlas's 3,300 km.
Which can fly higher, the A400M Atlas or C-17 Globemaster III?
The C-17 Globemaster III has a higher service ceiling at 13,715 meters (44,996 ft) compared to the A400M Atlas's 12,500 meters (41,010 ft).
Which is heavier, the A400M Atlas or C-17 Globemaster III?
The C-17 Globemaster III has a higher maximum takeoff weight at 259,460 kg compared to the A400M Atlas's 141,000 kg.
Which is larger, the A400M Atlas or C-17 Globemaster III?
The C-17 Globemaster III is longer at 53.0 meters compared to the A400M Atlas's 45.1 meters.
Which is more expensive, the A400M Atlas or C-17 Globemaster III?
The C-17 Globemaster III is more expensive at approximately $340 million per unit compared to the A400M Atlas at $152 million.
Which entered service first, the A400M Atlas or C-17 Globemaster III?
The C-17 Globemaster III entered service first in 1993, 20 years before the A400M Atlas which entered service in 2013.
Which has been built in greater numbers, the A400M Atlas or C-17 Globemaster III?
The C-17 Globemaster III has been produced in greater numbers with 279 units compared to 174 units of the A400M Atlas.