GlobalMilitary.net Open-source military intelligence Updated daily

2S3 Akatsiya vs PzH 2000

2S3 Akatsiya vs PzH 2000 at a glance โ€” weight 27,500 vs 55,800 kg, top speed 60 vs 60 km/h, range 500 vs 420 km, crew 4-6 (commander, driver, gunner, loader, 2 ammunition bearers) vs 5 (commander, driver, gunner, and two loaders).

2S3 Akatsiya self-propelled artillery side profile drawing
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ 2S3 Akatsiya
PzH 2000 self-propelled artillery side profile drawing
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช PzH 2000
Specifications
2S3 Akatsiya PzH 2000
Origin country ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Russia ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany
Category Self-Propelled Artillery Self-Propelled Artillery
Type Self-Propelled Howitzer Self-Propelled Howitzer
Manufacturer Uraltransmash Krauss-Maffei Wegmann / Rheinmetall
Number produced 4,000 units 362 units
Estimated unit price $-- million $4.5 million
Combat weight 27.5 tons 55.8 tons
Maximum speed 60 km/h 60 km/h
Operational range 500 km 420 km
Length 7.77 m 11.67 m
Width 3.25 m 3.58 m
Height 3.05 m 3.06 m
Crew 4-6 (commander, driver, gunner, loader, 2 ammunition bearers) 5 (commander, driver, gunner, and two loaders)
Performance Radar Chart
Armament & Powertrain
2S3 Akatsiya PzH 2000
Main armament 152mm 2A33 howitzer 155mm L/52 rifled howitzer
Secondary weapon 7.62mm PKT machine gun 7.62mm MG3 machine gun
Engine V-59 12-cylinder diesel, 520 hp MTU 881 Ka-500 V8 diesel, 1,000 hp

Detailed Comparison

The 27.5-ton 2S3 Akatsiya mounts a 152.4mm L/28 howitzer capable of reaching 18.5 km, designed to support Soviet motor rifle and tank divisions through massed area fire. The 55.8-ton PzH 2000 utilizes a 155mm L/52 gun firing beyond 40 km, engineered to win counter-battery duels via automation, high burst rates, and strict crew survivability.

Development and Design

Designed by Uraltransmash in 1967 to counter the American M109, the 2S3 is built on the Object 303 tracked chassis. Over 4,000 units were manufactured, prioritizing low-cost production, mechanical simplicity, and ease of operation for conscript armies. Conversely, the KNDS/Rheinmetall PzH 2000 emerged in 1998 after the collapse of the SP70 program. Adhering to the Joint Ballistic Memorandum of Understanding (JBMOU), it integrates Leopard 2 chassis components with a digitized architecture and an automated ammunition handling system, reflecting NATO's shift toward fewer, networked platforms capable of independent operation.

Protection and Firepower

The PzH 2000 outranges and outfires the 2S3. Its 155mm L/52 chromium-lined barrel and autoloader deliver 10 rounds per minute, supporting multiple round simultaneous impact (MRSI) missions of up to five shells. Using base-bleed or M982 Excalibur munitions, it engages targets at 40 km. The five-man crew operates isolated from the 60-round magazine. The 2S3 relies on a 152.4mm 2A33 howitzer limited to 18.5 km (24 km with rocket-assisted projectiles). Loading is manual, restricting the fire rate to 3-4 rounds per minute. The turret stores 46 rounds without blast separation; hull penetration by loitering munitions or counter-battery fire routinely results in catastrophic ammunition detonations.

Mobility and Logistics

Both vehicles top out at 60 km/h, but present opposite logistical footprints. The 2S3 exerts low ground pressure, crossing marginal terrain and 30-ton weight-limit bridges common in Eastern Europe. Its 520-hp V-59 diesel requires minimal specialized support. The 55.8-ton PzH 2000 requires heavy recovery assets and armored vehicle-launched bridges (AVLB) for gap crossings. Its autoloader demands high maintenance; in Ukraine, firing rates exceeding 100 rounds daily caused mechanical failures, forcing the systems out of the theater to hubs in Lithuania for depot-level repair.

Deployment and Combat Record

The 2S3 has fought in nearly every post-Soviet conflict. In Ukraine, it forms the bulk of Russian divisional artillery but suffers heavy attrition against precision fires. The PzH 2000 saw initial combat in Afghanistan, but the war in Ukraine tested its high-intensity limits. Ukrainian data indicates PzH 2000 barrels have endured up to 20,000 roundsโ€”more than four times the manufacturer's 4,500-round limit.

Conclusion

The PzH 2000 holds a definitive edge in conventional warfare. Its 40 km range, MRSI capability, and automated fire control allow it to execute missions and displace before the 2S3 can maneuver into range. While the 2S3's 27-ton mass and mechanical simplicity provide higher operational availability in degraded logistical environments, its 18.5 km range consigns it to a static attritional role, where its lack of ammunition compartmentalization proves fatal against modern radar-directed counter-battery fire and drones.

Change comparison vs

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is faster, the 2S3 Akatsiya or PzH 2000?
The PzH 2000 is faster with a maximum road speed of 60 km/h compared to the 2S3 Akatsiya's 60 km/h.
Which has longer operational range, the 2S3 Akatsiya or PzH 2000?
The 2S3 Akatsiya has a longer operational range at 500 km compared to the PzH 2000's 420 km.
Which is heavier, the 2S3 Akatsiya or PzH 2000?
The PzH 2000 is heavier at 55.8 tons combat weight compared to the 2S3 Akatsiya's 27.5 tons.
Which is larger, the 2S3 Akatsiya or PzH 2000?
The PzH 2000 is longer at 11.67 meters compared to the 2S3 Akatsiya's 7.76 meters.
How many crew members do the 2S3 Akatsiya and PzH 2000 require?
The PzH 2000 requires a larger crew of 5 (commander, driver, gunner, and two loaders) compared to the 2S3 Akatsiya's 4-6 (commander, driver, gunner, loader, 2 ammunition bearers) crew members.
Which has been built in greater numbers, the 2S3 Akatsiya or PzH 2000?
The 2S3 Akatsiya has been produced in greater numbers with 4,000 units compared to 362 units of the PzH 2000.
What are the main armaments of the 2S3 Akatsiya and PzH 2000?
The 2S3 Akatsiya is armed with 152mm 2A33 howitzer while the PzH 2000 carries 155mm L/52 rifled howitzer as its main armament.