GlobalMilitary.net Open-source military intelligence Updated daily

F-15E Strike Eagle vs F-15EX Eagle II

F-15E Strike Eagle vs F-15EX Eagle II at a glance — top speed 2,655 vs 2,655 km/h, range 3,889 vs 3,889 km, max takeoff weight 36,741 vs 36,741 kg, built 525 vs 17 units.

Specifications
F-15E Strike Eagle F-15EX Eagle II
Origin country 🇺🇸 United States 🇺🇸 United States
Category Combat Aircraft Combat Aircraft
Manufacturer McDonnell Douglas Boeing
First flight 11 December 1986 2 February 2021
Year introduced 1986 2024
Number produced 525 units 17 units
Average unit price $87 million $150 million
Wing area 56.0 m² 56.5 m²
Wingspan 13.1 m 13.1 m
Height 5.6 m 5.7 m
Length 19.4 m 19.4 m
Maximum speed 2655 km/h 2655 km/h
Operational range 3,889 km 3,889 km
Service ceiling 18,288 m 18,000 m
Max. takeoff weight 36,741 kg 36,741 kg
Empty weight 14,379 kg 16,103 kg
Total thrust 2 x 13,200 kgf 2 x 129 kN
Performance Radar Chart

Detailed Comparison

McDonnell Douglas built the F-15E Strike Eagle in the 1980s as a dedicated deep-interdiction platform to replace the F-111 Aardvark. Three decades later, Boeing engineered the F-15EX Eagle II not primarily as a strike asset, but as an arsenal ship and homeland defense interceptor to replace aging F-15C/D air superiority fleets. While they share an outer mold line, the EX is a fundamentally different digital platform derived from Qatari and Saudi export variants.

Development and Design

The F-15E was engineered around a mechanical flight control system and federated avionics. Its architecture required conformal fuel tanks (CFTs) to achieve unrefueled deep strike ranges without sacrificing underwing hardpoints. The F-15EX abandons legacy hydromechanical controls for a full digital fly-by-wire (FBW) system. This shift activates wing stations 1 and 9, which were previously dormant due to aerodynamic flutter risks. Internally, the EX operates on an open mission systems architecture driven by the Advanced Display Core Processor II (ADCP II), replacing analog gauges with 10x19-inch Large Area Displays. Survivability upgrades center on the BAE Systems AN/ALQ-250 EPAWSS, providing integrated radar warning and jamming that the F-15E’s older EW suites cannot match against modern surface-to-air threats.

Specifications and Performances

Both airframes max out at Mach 2.5 and share a 36,741 kg maximum takeoff weight, but they utilize that mass differently.

  • The EX airframe is rated for 20,000 flight hours, double the C-model it replaces and a heavy upgrade over the E-model's baseline.
  • Standard air-to-air loadouts jump from 8 missiles on the E to 12 on the EX, with proposed AMBER racks pushing capacity toward 22.
  • The shift to the AN/APG-82(V)1 AESA radar gives the EX a tracking volume and resistance to electronic attack that the F-15E’s legacy mechanically scanned APG-70 cannot achieve.
  • The EX transitions to General Electric F110-GE-129 turbofans over the E’s Pratt & Whitney F100s.

Deployment and usage

The F-15E possesses a heavily documented combat record. It executed the "Package Q" strike in Desert Storm, suppressed air defenses in the Balkans, and conducted decades of close air support in Iraq and Afghanistan. The F-15EX reached initial operational capability with the 142nd Wing in July 2024. USAF doctrine positions the EX not for penetrating contested airspace—a role reserved for the F-35—but as a standoff weapons truck. It provides high payload capacity for outsized munitions, such as hypersonic glide vehicles or the AIM-260 JATM, operating from the periphery of anti-access/area denial (A2AD) zones. Export demand mirrors this shift, with Israel ordering 25 F-15IA variants to bypass the payload limitations of fifth-generation platforms.

Conclusion

The F-15EX outright defeats the F-15E in air-to-air capacity, sensor fusion, and EW survivability. For high-end conflicts requiring stand-off hypersonic launch, massed AMRAAM employment, or rapid software updates, the F-15EX is the mandated solution. However, at $150 million per unit, the EX fails as a cost-effective bomb truck. The F-15E remains the superior asset for persistent close air support in low-threat theaters where dropping JDAMs or Paveways does not justify risking a digital asset carrying EPAWSS and AESA hardware.

Change comparison vs

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is faster, the F-15E Strike Eagle or F-15EX Eagle II?
The F-15EX Eagle II is faster with a maximum speed of 2,655 km/h compared to the F-15E Strike Eagle's 2,655 km/h, a difference of 0 km/h.
Which has longer range, the F-15E Strike Eagle or F-15EX Eagle II?
The F-15EX Eagle II has a longer range at 3,889 km compared to the F-15E Strike Eagle's 3,889 km.
Which can fly higher, the F-15E Strike Eagle or F-15EX Eagle II?
The F-15E Strike Eagle has a higher service ceiling at 18,288 meters (60,000 ft) compared to the F-15EX Eagle II's 18,000 meters (59,055 ft).
Which is heavier, the F-15E Strike Eagle or F-15EX Eagle II?
The F-15EX Eagle II has a higher maximum takeoff weight at 36,741 kg compared to the F-15E Strike Eagle's 36,741 kg.
Which is larger, the F-15E Strike Eagle or F-15EX Eagle II?
The F-15EX Eagle II is longer at 19.4 meters compared to the F-15E Strike Eagle's 19.4 meters.
Which is more expensive, the F-15E Strike Eagle or F-15EX Eagle II?
The F-15EX Eagle II is more expensive at approximately $150 million per unit compared to the F-15E Strike Eagle at $87 million.
Which entered service first, the F-15E Strike Eagle or F-15EX Eagle II?
The F-15E Strike Eagle entered service first in 1986, 38 years before the F-15EX Eagle II which entered service in 2024.
Which has been built in greater numbers, the F-15E Strike Eagle or F-15EX Eagle II?
The F-15E Strike Eagle has been produced in greater numbers with 525 units compared to 17 units of the F-15EX Eagle II.