GlobalMilitary.net Open-source military intelligence Updated daily

AH-1 Cobra vs EC665 Tiger

AH-1 Cobra vs EC665 Tiger at a glance — top speed 277 vs 315 km/h, range 570 vs 800 km, max takeoff weight 8,391 vs 6,100 kg, built 1,116 vs 180 units.

Bell AH-1 Cobra military helicopters side profile drawing
🇺🇸 AH-1 Cobra
Eurocopter EC665 Tiger military helicopters side profile drawing
🇩🇪🇫🇷 EC665 Tiger
Specifications
AH-1 Cobra EC665 Tiger
Origin country 🇺🇸 United States 🇩🇪 Germany🇫🇷 France
Category Military Helicopters Military Helicopters
Manufacturer Bell Eurocopter
First flight 7 September 1965 27 April 1991
Year introduced 1967 2002
Number produced 1116 units 180 units
Average unit price $13 million $36 million
Wingspan 13.4 m 4.5 m
Height 4.4 m 3.8 m
Length 17.8 m 15.8 m
Maximum speed 277 km/h 315 km/h
Operational range 570 km 800 km
Service ceiling 6,096 m 2,000 m
Max. takeoff weight 8,391 kg 6,100 kg
Empty weight 5,579 kg 4,200 kg
Total thrust 2 x 1,342 kW 2 x 958 kW
Performance Radar Chart

Detailed Comparison

The EC665 Tiger, a product of Franco-German collaboration from the 1990s, was designed as a modern, agile multirole attack helicopter with an emphasis on reduced radar signature through the extensive use of composite materials. In contrast, the Bell AH-1 Cobra originated in the 1960s as a dedicated gunship, rapidly developed from the UH-1 Huey airframe to meet urgent combat needs in Vietnam. While the Tiger was a "clean-sheet" design incorporating stealth concepts, the Cobra's legacy is one of continuous, combat-driven evolution from a simple escort to the highly advanced AH-1Z Viper.

Development and Design

The Tiger's development was a deliberate, multinational effort to create a lighter, more maneuverable European counterpart to the AH-64 Apache, integrating advanced glass cockpit avionics and modular weapon systems from the outset. Its airframe, comprising over 80% composite materials, provides ballistic tolerance and a reduced radar cross-section. The Cobra's design philosophy was initially driven by simplicity and speed of production. Its defining features were the narrow fuselage and tandem, stepped seating, which minimized its frontal profile and made it a difficult target. Subsequent variants, especially the twin-engine AH-1W SuperCobra and AH-1Z Viper for the US Marine Corps, represent a complete redesign with four-bladed rotors, uprated engines, and a fully integrated digital mission suite.

Specifications and Performances

A comparison of specifications reveals the results of these different evolutionary paths. The modern AH-1Z variant is a heavier and more powerful aircraft, with a max takeoff weight of 8,391 kg compared to the Tiger's 6,100 kg, supported by significantly more powerful engines. This allows the Cobra to carry a larger ordnance load. The AH-1Z also boasts a much higher service ceiling (6,096 m vs. 2,000 m) and a superior climb rate, reflecting the performance gains of its advanced rotor and powertrain systems. Conversely, the Tiger possesses a substantially greater ferry range (800 km), indicating a design optimized for longer-range support and reconnaissance missions where a heavy payload is not the primary requirement.

Deployment and usage

The AH-1 Cobra has one of the most extensive combat records of any attack helicopter, serving from Vietnam through the Gulf War to recent operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. It has been a workhorse platform, primarily for the US Army and later the US Marine Corps, in direct fire support and anti-armor roles. The EC665 Tiger’s operational history is more recent and limited, with deployments by French and German forces in Afghanistan, Libya, and Mali. In these conflicts, it has been used for armed reconnaissance, escort, and precision strikes, aligning with its multirole design. However, the Australian ARH variant's service life has been marked by significant sustainment and availability issues.

Conclusion

The AH-1 Cobra lineage demonstrates the success of iterative, combat-proven development, evolving a 1960s design into the formidable AH-1Z Viper. It remains a benchmark for payload, power, and battlefield resilience, particularly in the maritime environment. The EC665 Tiger represents a newer design philosophy, prioritizing agility, advanced systems integration, and low observability. While a capable platform in its intended roles, its higher cost, more limited combat exposure, and documented serviceability challenges in some forces present a different operational profile. The choice between them reflects a divergence in doctrine: the Cobra as a heavily armed brawler and the Tiger as a more nimble, high-tech scout and striker.

Change comparison vs

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is faster, the AH-1 Cobra or EC665 Tiger?
The EC665 Tiger is faster with a maximum speed of 315 km/h compared to the AH-1 Cobra's 277 km/h, a difference of 38 km/h.
Which has longer range, the AH-1 Cobra or EC665 Tiger?
The EC665 Tiger has a longer range at 800 km compared to the AH-1 Cobra's 570 km.
Which can fly higher, the AH-1 Cobra or EC665 Tiger?
The AH-1 Cobra has a higher service ceiling at 6,096 meters (20,000 ft) compared to the EC665 Tiger's 2,000 meters (6,561 ft).
Which is heavier, the AH-1 Cobra or EC665 Tiger?
The AH-1 Cobra has a higher maximum takeoff weight at 8,391 kg compared to the EC665 Tiger's 6,100 kg.
Which is larger, the AH-1 Cobra or EC665 Tiger?
The AH-1 Cobra is longer at 17.8 meters compared to the EC665 Tiger's 15.8 meters.
Which is more expensive, the AH-1 Cobra or EC665 Tiger?
The EC665 Tiger is more expensive at approximately $36 million per unit compared to the AH-1 Cobra at $13 million.
Which entered service first, the AH-1 Cobra or EC665 Tiger?
The AH-1 Cobra entered service first in 1967, 35 years before the EC665 Tiger which entered service in 2002.
Which has been built in greater numbers, the AH-1 Cobra or EC665 Tiger?
The AH-1 Cobra has been produced in greater numbers with 1,116 units compared to 180 units of the EC665 Tiger.